Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc.
How CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. stacks up
CCC · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #810 of 1,667 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CCC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.9% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CCC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 0.9% | 2.3% | 34% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 5.5% | 4.3% | 58% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | Not reported | 2.7% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 39.3% | 33.4% | 59% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CCC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 810 | 128.4B TWD (≈$4.0B) | 51 | 43 | |
| 810 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score