Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Post Holdings, Inc.
How Post Holdings, Inc. stacks up
POST · against 153 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #29 of 154 · scores higher than 81% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including POST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.0% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.5% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 15.1% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = POST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | POST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 149 reported | 6.5% | 5.0% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 154 reported | 13.1% | 9.6% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 14.7% | 7.2% | 89% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 84.2% | 46.0% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around POST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 1 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 3 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 3 | 24.2B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 95 | 64 | |
| 5 | 355.7B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 94 | 70 | |
| 26 | 6.5B USD | 80 | 51 | |
| 26 | 36.93T IDR (≈$2.3B) | 80 | 86 | |
| 28 | 6.1B USD | 79 | 58 | |
| 29 | 3.9B USD | 78 | 64 | |
| 29 | 3.8B USD | 78 | 50 | |
| 31 | 2.3B USD | 77 | 50 | |
| 31 | 4.9B USD | 77 | 64 | |
| 33 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 76 | 73 | |
| 33 | 45.8B MXN (≈$2.5B) | 76 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score