Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
How Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. stacks up
SFM · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
77/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #181 of 799 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including SFM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.3% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.7% vs peer median 8.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 86% of peers. Earnings yield: 10.3% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SFM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SFM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 10.0% | 4.5% | 86% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 12.7% | 8.9% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 7.3% | 6.3% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 29.8% | 54.4% | 23% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SFM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 181 | 1.0B MYR (≈$226M) | 77 | 44 | |
| 181 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score