Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Embotelladora Andina S.A.
How Embotelladora Andina S.A. stacks up
AKO-A · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #173 of 799 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including AKO-A · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.1% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AKO-A, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AKO-A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 8.1% | 4.5% | 79% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | Not reported | 8.9% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 11.6% | 6.3% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | Not reported | 54.4% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AKO-A| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 165 | 8.8B ZAR (≈$485M) | 79 | 64 | |
| 173 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score