Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Polaris Inc.
How Polaris Inc. stacks up
PII · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
28/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,135 of 1,586 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including PII · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 87% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -6.6% vs peer median 4.3%
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PII, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PII | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 8.4% | 3.7% | 69% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | Not reported | 4.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | -6.6% | 4.3% | 13% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PII| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1,135 | 4.4B SEK (≈$444M) | 28 | 33 | |
| 1,135 | 263M BRL (≈$47M) | 28 | 37 | |
| 1,135 | 2.2B GBP (≈$2.8B) | 28 | 45 | |
| 1,135 | 7.9B USD | 28 | 31 | |
| 1,135 | 3.6B USD | 28 | 15 | |
| 1,151 | 3.4B CNY (≈$470M) | 27 | 39 | |
| 1,151 | 2.6B CNY (≈$368M) | 27 | 54 | |
| 1,151 | 21.8B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 27 | 51 | |
| 1,151 | 30.7B TWD (≈$952M) | 27 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score