Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PHINIA Inc.
How PHINIA Inc. stacks up
PHIN · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #596 of 1,586 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including PHIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.7% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 67% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 32.7% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PHIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PHIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 7.7% | 3.7% | 67% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | 32.7% | 4.1% | 76% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 1.7% | 4.3% | 38% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PHIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 596 | 24.8B USD | 62 | 54 | |
| 596 | 81.9B USD | 62 | 45 | |
| 596 | 188M USD | 62 | 17 | |
| 596 | 45.4B ZAR (≈$2.5B) | 62 | 71 | |
| 596 | 2.5B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 596 | 715M SEK (≈$71M) | 62 | 63 | |
| 596 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 62 | 70 | |
| 596 | 41.2B INR (≈$494M) | 62 | 58 | |
| 612 | 22.1B TWD (≈$685M) | 61 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score