Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PHIN · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #71 of 356 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including PHIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | PHIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.0% | 4.3% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 15.1% | 8.4% | 92% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 9.9% | 5.3% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 61.0% | 35.8% | 67% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 71 | 963M USD | 68 | 59 | |
| 71 | 39.3B USD | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 53 |
| 71 | 7.4B USD | 68 | 67 |
| 71 | 1.2B USD | 68 | 46 |
| 71 | 2.5B USD | 68 | 55 |
| 71 | 219M USD | 68 | 56 |
| 77 | 34.3B USD | 67 | 60 |
| 77 | 808M USD | 67 | 38 |
| 77 | 1.0B USD | 67 | 60 |