Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZUMZ · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #490 of 1,553 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ZUMZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | ZUMZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 4.6% | 4.4% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 12.1% | 8.8% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 11.4% | 6.1% | 73% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 123.2% | 57.2% | 81% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 490 | 947M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 68 | 59 | |
| 490 | 5.9B GBP (≈$7.6B) | 68 | 50 | |
| 490 | 1.2B USD | 68 | 46 | |
| 490 | 2.5B USD | 68 | 55 | |
| 490 | 219M USD | 68 | 56 | |
| 506 | 1.6B HKD (≈$200M) | 67 | 68 | |
| 506 | 454M SGD (≈$345M) | 67 | 59 | |
| 506 | 178M MYR (≈$39M) | 67 | 26 | |
| 506 | 625.7B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 67 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score