Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PepsiCo, Inc.
How PepsiCo, Inc. stacks up
PEP · against 149 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #62 of 150 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including PEP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.6% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.2% vs peer median 8.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.8% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PEP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PEP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | 5.8% | 3.7% | 68% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 151 reported | 8.4% | 9.0% | 46% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 5.0% | 5.8% | 44% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | 11.8% | 39.9% | 16% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PEP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 933M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 2 | 212M USD | 93 | 72 | |
| 2 | 843M USD | 93 | 88 | |
| 4 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 67 | |
| 58 | 2.1B USD | 53 | 42 | |
| 58 | 139.6B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 60 | 7.6B USD | 52 | 43 | |
| 60 | 128.5B USD | 52 | 46 | |
| 62 | 187.1B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 63 | 34.7B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 63 | 35.5B USD | 49 | 40 | |
| 65 | 3.7B USD | 48 | 60 | |
| 65 | 39.5B USD | 48 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score