Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Unilever PLC
How Unilever PLC stacks up
UL · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #373 of 799 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score79 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including UL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.0% vs peer median 8.7%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.5% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.5% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 4.5% | 4.5% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 7.3% | 8.9% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 12.6% | 54.4% | 8% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 373 | 2.1B USD | 53 | 42 | |
| 373 | 92.3B INR (≈$1.1B) | 53 | 69 | |
| 373 | 751M CAD (≈$548M) | 53 | 42 | |
| 373 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 53 | 53 | |
| 373 | 139.6B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 381 | 298.6B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 52 | 49 | |
| 381 | 5.4B SAR (≈$1.5B) | 52 | 47 | |
| 381 | 651M SAR (≈$176M) | 52 | 34 | |
| 381 | 50.1B JPY (≈$341M) | 52 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score