Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
KR · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #412 of 799 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including KR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | KR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 2.7% | 4.5% | 32% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 13.0% | 8.9% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 6.0% | 6.3% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 14.7% | 54.4% | 10% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 412 | 6.8B CNY (≈$956M) | 48 | 37 | |
| 412 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 25.2B NOK (≈$2.4B) |
| 48 |
| 50 |
| 412 | 73M AUD (≈$48M) | 48 | 33 |
| 412 | 3.7B USD | 48 | 60 |
| 412 | 39.5B USD | 48 | 26 |
| 412 | 257.2B MXN (≈$13.9B) | 48 | 39 |
| 412 | 8.2B THB (≈$229M) | 48 | 67 |
| 420 | 4.2B CNY (≈$584M) | 47 | 61 |
| 420 | 70.1B JPY (≈$477M) | 47 | 54 |