Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PG&E Corporation
How PG&E Corporation stacks up
PCG · against 44 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #21 of 45 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including PCG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Utilities peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.6% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 2.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PCG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PCG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 45 reported | 5.7% | 6.6% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 42 reported | 2.6% | 2.3% | 59% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 45 reported | 5.1% | 3.0% | 73% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PCG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.7B USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 2 | 896.4B THB (≈$25.1B) | 90 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2.21T INR (≈$26.5B) | 89 | 45 | |
| 3 | 43.2B USD | 89 | 54 | |
| 5 | 26.0B USD | 88 | 52 | |
| 17 | 27.3B USD | 65 | 39 | |
| 19 | 23.3B USD | 64 | 78 | |
| 19 | 28.0B USD | 64 | 46 | |
| 21 | 3.77T INR (≈$45.2B) | 61 | 62 | |
| 21 | 39.9B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 23 | 199.2B CNY (≈$27.9B) | 60 | 53 | |
| 23 | 20.7B EUR (≈$22.7B) | 60 | 48 | |
| 23 | 37.6B USD | 60 | 43 | |
| 26 | 30.5B USD | 57 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score