Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to PG&E Corporation
How PG&E Corporation stacks up
PCG · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #137 of 352 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including PCG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Utilities peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.6% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 2.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PCG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PCG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 5.7% | 2.5% | 60% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 2.6% | 1.6% | 54% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | 5.1% | 2.0% | 66% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PCG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 133 | 575.4B CLP (≈$633M) | 62 | 46 | |
| 133 | 5.4B USD | 62 | 56 | |
| 137 | 96.4B HKD (≈$12.3B) | 61 | 51 | |
| 137 | 3.77T INR (≈$45.2B) | 61 | 62 | |
| 137 | 39.9B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 140 | 199.2B CNY (≈$27.9B) | 60 | 53 | |
| 140 | Unavailable | 60 | 58 | |
| 140 | 20.7B EUR (≈$22.7B) | 60 | 48 | |
| 140 | 37.6B USD | 60 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score