Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Paycom Software, Inc.
How Paycom Software, Inc. stacks up
PAYC · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #293 of 479 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score47 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including PAYC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Technology peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -9.4% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAYC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAYC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 8.9% | 13.1% | 38% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | -9.4% | 22.4% | 24% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 14.3% | 9.7% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAYC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 293 | 210M USD | 54 | 30 | |
| 293 | 14.4B USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 293 | 5.4B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 293 | 2.1B USD | 54 | 73 | |
| 293 | 11.9B USD | 54 | 55 | |
| 293 | 5.6B USD | 54 | 24 | |
| 300 | 2.3B USD | 53 | 64 | |
| 300 | 1.1B USD | 53 | 39 | |
| 300 | 772M USD | 53 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score