Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ePlus inc.
How ePlus inc. stacks up
PLUS · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
53/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #777 of 1,669 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including PLUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.5% vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: 15.7% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PLUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PLUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 15.7% | 8.5% | 69% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 2.5% | 11.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 4.7% | 4.8% | 49% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PLUS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 777 | 81.3B JPY (≈$553M) | 53 | 73 | |
| 777 | 208.8B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 53 | 80 | |
| 777 | 63.4B JPY (≈$431M) | 53 | 85 | |
| 777 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 53 | 61 | |
| 777 | 2.3B USD | 53 | 64 | |
| 777 | 1.1B USD | 53 | 39 | |
| 777 | 772M USD | 53 | 21 | |
| 777 | 830M EUR (≈$913M) | 53 | 60 | |
| 777 | 16.6B USD | 53 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score