Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GoDaddy Inc.
How GoDaddy Inc. stacks up
GDDY · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #759 of 1,669 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including GDDY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.1% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 23.1% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GDDY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GDDY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 7.4% | 8.5% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 23.1% | 11.1% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 7.1% | 4.8% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GDDY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 759 | 470.4B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 54 | 66 | |
| 759 | 676M EUR (≈$744M) | 54 | 62 | |
| 759 | 200M USD | 54 | 32 | |
| 759 | 210M USD | 54 | 30 | |
| 759 | 14.4B USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 759 | 448.1B INR (≈$5.4B) | 54 | 69 | |
| 759 | 5.4B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 759 | 2.1B USD | 54 | 73 | |
| 759 | 11.9B USD | 54 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score