Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Oxford Industries, Inc.
How Oxford Industries, Inc. stacks up
OXM · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #630 of 1,553 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including OXM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 13.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.3% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OXM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OXM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | -1.8% | 4.4% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 9.2% | 8.8% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 12.3% | 6.1% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 133.6% | 57.2% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OXM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 630 | 707M USD | 59 | 74 | |
| 630 | 1.1B AUD (≈$741M) | 59 | 56 | |
| 630 | 16.1B USD | 59 | 66 | |
| 630 | 1.9B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 59 | 46 | |
| 630 | 423M USD | 59 | 33 | |
| 630 | 96M EUR (≈$106M) | 59 | 42 | |
| 630 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 59 | 65 | |
| 646 | 44.9B KRW (≈$32M) | 58 | 48 | |
| 646 | 30.2B TWD (≈$935M) | 58 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score