Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Oxford Industries, Inc.
How Oxford Industries, Inc. stacks up
OXM · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,309 of 1,586 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score159 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including OXM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 74% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OXM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OXM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | -1.8% | 3.7% | 28% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | Not reported | 4.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | -1.5% | 4.3% | 26% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OXMScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score