Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to On Holding AG
How On Holding AG stacks up
ONON · against 160 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #17 of 161 · scores higher than 89% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score22 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including ONON · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -18.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 94% of peers. Revenue growth: 30.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 35.1% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ONON, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ONON | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 161 reported | 30.0% | 6.7% | 91% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 139 reported | -18.1% | 8.1% | 21% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 160 reported | 35.1% | 8.6% | 93% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ONON| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 15 | 15.98T CLP (≈$17.6B) | 92 | 74 | |
| 15 | 7.5B USD | 92 | 25 | |
| 17 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 91 | 79 | |
| 17 | 8.0B USD | 91 | 26 | |
| 17 | 12.2B USD | 91 | 63 | |
| 20 | 45.4B CNY (≈$6.4B) | 90 | 71 | |
| 20 | 8.8B USD | 90 | 55 | |
| 20 | 1.62T INR (≈$19.4B) | 90 | 65 | |
| 23 | 151.9B HKD (≈$19.4B) | 89 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score