Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to OneWater Marine Inc.
How OneWater Marine Inc. stacks up
ONEW · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #521 of 1,553 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ONEW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -75.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 33.4% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ONEW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ONEW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | -75.8% | 4.4% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 8.9% | 8.8% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 33.4% | 6.1% | 95% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 170.2% | 57.2% | 89% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ONEW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 521 | 544M USD | 66 | 50 | |
| 521 | 293M USD | 66 | 89 | |
| 521 | 3.9B SEK (≈$394M) | 66 | 38 | |
| 521 | 364M USD | 66 | 44 | |
| 521 | 168M USD | 66 | 41 | |
| 521 | 153M EUR (≈$168M) | 66 | 57 | |
| 521 | 499M USD | 66 | 72 | |
| 521 | 624M SGD (≈$474M) | 66 | 82 | |
| 537 | 50.3B TWD (≈$1.6B) | 65 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score