Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Monro, Inc.
How Monro, Inc. stacks up
MNRO · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #521 of 1,553 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MNRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 17.4% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNRO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 1.9% | 4.4% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 9.7% | 8.8% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 2.8% | 6.1% | 30% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 160.2% | 57.2% | 88% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNRO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 521 | 4.1B NOK (≈$393M) | 66 | 33 | |
| 521 | 544M USD | 66 | 50 | |
| 521 | 293M USD | 66 | 89 | |
| 521 | 3.9B SEK (≈$394M) | 66 | 38 | |
| 521 | 364M USD | 66 | 44 | |
| 521 | 168M USD | 66 | 41 | |
| 521 | 153M EUR (≈$168M) | 66 | 57 | |
| 521 | 499M USD | 66 | 72 | |
| 521 | 624M SGD (≈$474M) | 66 | 82 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score