Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Obsidian Energy Ltd.
How Obsidian Energy Ltd. stacks up
OBE · against 196 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #129 of 197 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score15 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including OBE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 70% of peers. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 8.6% vs peer median 11.7%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 11.3% vs peer median 9.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = OBE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | OBE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 190 reported | 11.3% | 9.2% | 59% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 193 reported | 8.6% | 13.4% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 194 reported | 1.9% | 4.4% | 32% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 190 reported | 2.0% | 11.8% | 25% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported | 59.3% | 41.2% | 70% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around OBE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.8B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 986M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 126 | 4.6B USD | 35 | 54 | |
| 126 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score