Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Global Partners LP
How Global Partners LP stacks up
GLP · against 400 other Energy companies
Profitability
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #260 of 401 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score40 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including GLP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 85% of peers. Operating margin: 1.5% vs peer median 11.7%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 10.1% vs peer median 9.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 4.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | 10.1% | 9.3% | 52% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 398 reported | 1.5% | 11.7% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 391 reported | 4.9% | 4.4% | 55% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 384 reported | 27.2% | 10.5% | 86% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 5.8% | 33.2% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 256 | 18.4B USD | 36 | 51 | |
| 260 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 35 | 38 | |
| 260 | 2.7B USD | 35 | 43 | |
| 260 | 69.4B USD | 35 | 49 | |
| 260 | 1.5B USD | 35 | 49 | |
| 264 | 140.4B JPY (≈$955M) | 34 | 54 | |
| 264 | 548M GBP (≈$712M) | 34 | 60 | |
| 264 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 34 | 20 | |
| 264 | 697M USD | 34 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score