Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ENB · against 400 other Energy companies
Ranked #268 of 401 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score40 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including ENB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
| Metric | ENB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | 5.0% | 9.3% | 28% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 398 reported | 13.3% | 11.7% | 54% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 391 reported | 2.6% | 4.4% | 35% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 384 reported | 9.2% | 10.5% | 45% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 32.6% | 33.2% | 48% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 264 | 140.4B JPY (≈$955M) | 34 | 54 | |
| 264 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 548M GBP (≈$712M) |
| 34 |
| 60 |
| 264 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 34 | 20 |
| 264 | 697M USD | 34 | 50 |
| 268 | 109.1B USD | 33 | 37 |
| 268 | 9.34T IDR (≈$579M) | 33 | 41 |
| 268 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 33 | 56 |
| 268 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 33 | 51 |
| 272 | 3.4B CNY (≈$473M) | 32 | 45 |