Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Novo Nordisk A/S
How Novo Nordisk A/S stacks up
NVO · against 24 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #10 of 25 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including NVO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 1.8% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 20.4% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NVO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NVO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 6.4% | 7.3% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 24 reported | 1.8% | 22.3% | 22% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 20.4% | 6.0% | 100% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NVO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 126.5B USD | 78 | 56 | |
| 2 | 155.7B USD | 73 | 64 | |
| 3 | 540.4B BRL (≈$97.3B) | 72 | 64 | |
| 3 | 97.5B USD | 72 | 67 | |
| 3 | 162.93T ARS (≈$162.9B) | 72 | 63 | |
| 6 | 116.5B USD | 69 | 57 | |
| 7 | 285.2B USD | 64 | 63 | |
| 8 | 249.4B USD | 63 | 55 | |
| 8 | 126.1B USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 10 | 177.5B USD | 60 | 71 | |
| 11 | 119.1B USD | 58 | 57 | |
| 11 | 134.5B USD | 58 | 70 | |
| 13 | 302.7B USD | 57 | 63 | |
| 14 | 108.6B USD | 55 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score