Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.
How Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
NUS · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #341 of 799 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score79 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including NUS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield and free cash flow yield than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -94.6% vs peer median 4.5%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.7% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 97% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.5% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NUS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NUS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -96.0% | 4.5% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 37.0% | 8.9% | 97% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 4.7% | 6.3% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 237.1% | 54.4% | 95% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NUS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 341 | 797.3B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 57 | 52 | |
| 341 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score