Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to British American Tobacco p.l.c.
How British American Tobacco p.l.c. stacks up
BTI · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #341 of 799 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score79 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including BTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.5% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.6% vs peer median 8.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.3% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BTI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 6.4% | 4.5% | 68% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 8.6% | 8.9% | 48% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | Not reported | 54.4% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BTI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 333 | 851M CAD (≈$621M) | 58 | 54 | |
| 341 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score