Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NetEase, Inc.
How NetEase, Inc. stacks up
NTES · against 495 other Communication Services companies
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #212 of 496 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score49 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including NTES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 14.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 502 reported | 7.0% | 3.0% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 278 reported | 14.0% | 8.8% | 57% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 491 reported | 5.3% | 3.0% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.7B CNY (≈$13.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 4 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 4 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 207 | 11.5B USD | 58 | 55 | |
| 212 | 39.0B HKD (≈$5.0B) | 57 | 38 | |
| 212 | 10.9B USD | 57 | 31 | |
| 212 | 2.74T IDR (≈$170M) | 57 | 34 | |
| 212 | 74.4B USD | 57 | 75 | |
| 212 | 25.3B EUR (≈$27.8B) | 57 | 58 | |
| 217 | 577.6B JPY (≈$3.9B) | 56 | 75 | |
| 217 | 928.8B JPY (≈$6.3B) | 56 | 53 | |
| 217 | 11.24T JPY (≈$76.4B) | 56 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score