Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Globalstar, Inc.
How Globalstar, Inc. stacks up
GSAT · against 495 other Communication Services companies
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #212 of 496 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score49 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including GSAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Communication Services peers.
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 8.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.7% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.4% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GSAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GSAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 502 reported | 7.7% | 3.0% | 65% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 278 reported | Not reported | 8.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 491 reported | 13.4% | 3.0% | 81% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GSAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.7B CNY (≈$13.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 18.5B USD | 100 | 81 | |
| 4 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 4 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 207 | 373.7B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 58 | 72 | |
| 207 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score