Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NMRK · against 175 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #134 of 176 · scores higher than 24% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)29 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including NMRK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NMRK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 174 reported | 1.30× | 0.84× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 172 reported | 1.76 | 0.79 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 175 reported | 1.09× | 1.02× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 130 | 4.8B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 26 | 46 | |
| 131 | 26.1B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 26 | 14 | |
| 132 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 25 | 62 | |
| 133 | 3.2B EUR (≈$3.5B) | 24 | 38 | |
| 134 | 2.9B USD | 23 | 68 | |
| 135 | 4.8B USD | 23 | 52 | |
| 136 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 23 | 55 | |
| 137 | 5.3B USD | 23 | 51 | |
| 138 | 1.9B GBP (≈$2.4B) | 22 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score