Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NHI · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #221 of 751 · scores higher than 71% of peers · safety percentile 71
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including NHI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and beta, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NHI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.80× | 0.82× | 51% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.52 | 0.69 | 62% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.82× | 1.20× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 217 | 275M USD | 71 | 36 | |
| 218 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.2B SAR (≈$330M) |
| 71 |
| 53 |
| 219 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 71 | 75 |
| 220 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 71 | 49 |
| 221 | 3.4B USD | 71 | 69 |
| 222 | 29.0B THB (≈$813M) | 71 | 82 |
| 223 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.1B) | 70 | 55 |
| 224 | 227.1B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 70 | 44 |
| 225 | 3.3B CNY (≈$468M) | 70 | 29 |