Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NGL Energy Partners LP
How NGL Energy Partners LP stacks up
NGL · against 193 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
18/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #158 of 194 · scores higher than 18% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including NGL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.5% vs peer median 5.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.7% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.0% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NGL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NGL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 189 reported | -20.0% | 5.2% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 11.0% | 11.9% | 43% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 5.0% | 5.9% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | -27.0% | 50.6% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NGL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 254M USD | 96 | 88 | |
| 5 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 155 | 109.1B USD | 20 | 37 | |
| 155 | 9.2B USD | 20 | 39 | |
| 157 | 64.0B USD | 19 | 37 | |
| 158 | 883M USD | 18 | 42 | |
| 158 | 2.0B USD | 18 | 15 | |
| 158 | 881M USD | 18 | 31 | |
| 161 | 596M USD | 17 | 34 | |
| 162 | 590M USD | 16 | 21 | |
| 162 | 1.6B USD | 16 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score