Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NFLX · against 505 other Communication Services companies
Ranked #392 of 506 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)51 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including NFLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NFLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 466 reported | 0.55× | 0.40× | 42% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 497 reported | 1.53 | 0.60 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 496 reported | 1.14× | 1.38× | 40% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.4B KRW (≈$18M) | 100 | 26 | |
| 2 | 87.1B JPY (≈$592M) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1.01T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 4 | 1.85T JPY (≈$12.6B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 5 | 56.1B JPY (≈$381M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 388 | 1.9B SGD (≈$1.5B) | 23 | 41 | |
| 389 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) |
| 23 |
| 24 |
| 390 | 180.9B USD | 23 | 46 |
| 391 | 1.1B AUD (≈$717M) | 23 | 40 |
| 392 | 290.2B USD | 23 | 58 |
| 393 | 3.6B USD | 22 | 55 |
| 394 | 17.4B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 22 | 33 |
| 395 | 2.3B AUD (≈$1.5B) | 22 | 41 |
| 396 | 7M EUR (≈$7M) | 22 |