Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NFLX · against 7 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #7 of 8 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)4 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including NFLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NFLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 8 reported | 0.55× | 0.92× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 8 reported | 1.53 | 0.84 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 8 reported | 1.14× | 0.95× | 71% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.61T JPY (≈$160.6B) | 61 | 61 | |
| 2 | 3.79T HKD (≈$484.9B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 3 | 167.7B USD | 34 | 61 | |
| 4 | 179.8B USD | 27 | 54 | |
| 5 | 190.2B USD | 26 | 51 | |
| 6 | 180.9B USD | 23 | 46 | |
| 7 | 290.2B USD | 23 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 8 | 35.96T JPY (≈$244.5B) | 19 | 40 |