Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NCLH · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,575 of 1,585 · scores higher than 1% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including NCLH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NCLH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 6.21× | 0.50× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.96 | 0.56 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 0.20× | 1.48× | 1% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,572 | 1M USD | 1 | 3 | |
| 1,573 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 720M USD |
| 1 |
| 23 |
| 1,573 | 509M USD | 1 | 23 |
| 1,575 | 188M USD | 1 | 17 |
| 1,575 | 8.0B USD | 1 | 48 |
| 1,577 | 45.3B TRY (≈$1.4B) | 1 | 30 |
| 1,578 | 2.1B USD | 0 | 3 |
| 1,579 | 656M USD | 0 | 22 |
| 1,580 | 4.1B TRY (≈$123M) | 0 | 6 |