Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NC · against 49 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #10 of 50 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 89
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including NC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 49 reported | 0.29× | 0.46× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 48 reported | 0.56 | 0.45 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 51 reported | 3.30× | 1.53× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 575M AUD (≈$380M) | 95 | 47 | |
| 4 | 265M GBP (≈$344M) | 93 | 67 | |
| 5 | 1.9B CNY (≈$272M) | 93 | 35 | |
| 6 | 670.8B KRW (≈$483M) | 93 | 69 | |
| 7 | 3.1B CNY (≈$437M) | 92 | 66 | |
| 8 | 291M GBP (≈$378M) | 90 | 73 | |
| 9 | 134M USD | 90 | 45 | |
| 10 | 261M USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2.0B MYR (≈$443M) | 89 | 61 | |
| 12 | 496M USD | 88 | 85 | |
| 13 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 88 | 77 | |
| 14 | 328M USD | 84 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score