Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RNGR · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #65 of 399 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including RNGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RNGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.16× | 0.49× | 82% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.14 | 0.48 | 77% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 1.73× | 1.37× | 65% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 61 | 846M HKD (≈$108M) | 85 | 32 | |
| 62 | 135.3B INR (≈$1.6B) | 85 | 47 | |
| 63 | 882M USD | 84 | 40 | |
| 64 | 1.5B USD | 84 | 35 | |
| 65 | 328M USD | 84 | 54 | |
| 66 | 2.2B USD | 84 | 89 | |
| 67 | 42.6B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 83 | 63 | |
| 68 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 83 | 66 | |
| 69 | 140.4B JPY (≈$955M) | 83 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score