Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NACCO Industries, Inc.
How NACCO Industries, Inc. stacks up
NC · against 193 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #59 of 194 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score24 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including NC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 96% of peers. EBITDA yield: 14.9% vs peer median 12.1%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.6% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 189 reported | 6.7% | 5.2% | 62% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | -1.4% | 11.9% | 6% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | -1.6% | 5.9% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 167.2% | 50.6% | 98% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 254M USD | 96 | 88 | |
| 5 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 57 | 204.7B USD | 65 | 44 | |
| 57 | 17.6B USD | 65 | 31 | |
| 59 | 4.1B USD | 63 | 56 | |
| 59 | 56.7B USD | 63 | 57 | |
| 59 | 261M USD | 63 | 56 | |
| 59 | 7.5B USD | 63 | 79 | |
| 63 | 1.8B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 63 | 18.4B USD | 62 | 51 | |
| 63 | 336M USD | 62 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score