Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Nathan's Famous, Inc.
How Nathan's Famous, Inc. stacks up
NATH · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #169 of 356 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including NATH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 71% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -16.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 79% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NATH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NATH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 12.4% | 5.9% | 72% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -16.0% | 6.2% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 8.3% | 4.1% | 66% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NATH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 169 | 656M USD | 60 | 22 | |
| 169 | 439M USD | 60 | 85 | |
| 169 | 6.6B USD | 60 | 42 | |
| 169 | 473M USD | 60 | 62 | |
| 169 | 418M USD | 60 | 53 | |
| 169 | 3.3B USD | 60 | 60 | |
| 175 | 51.5B USD | 59 | 50 | |
| 175 | 19.7B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 175 | 6.8B USD | 59 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score