Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lithia Motors, Inc.
How Lithia Motors, Inc. stacks up
LAD · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #628 of 1,586 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including LAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 72% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.1% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LAD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 4.0% | 3.7% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | 9.0% | 4.1% | 56% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 10.1% | 4.3% | 72% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LAD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 628 | 33.9B JPY (≈$231M) | 60 | 77 | |
| 628 | 656M USD | 60 | 22 | |
| 628 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 60 | 82 | |
| 628 | 439M USD | 60 | 85 | |
| 628 | 6.6B USD | 60 | 42 | |
| 628 | 1.0B EUR (≈$1.1B) | 60 | 52 | |
| 628 | 473M USD | 60 | 62 | |
| 628 | 418M USD | 60 | 53 | |
| 628 | 137.5B EUR (≈$151.2B) | 60 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score