Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Churchill Downs Incorporated
How Churchill Downs Incorporated stacks up
CHDN · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #643 of 1,586 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score159 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CHDN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -3.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 75% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.9% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHDN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHDN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 5.7% | 3.7% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -3.6% | 4.1% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | 10.9% | 4.3% | 75% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHDN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 643 | 78.5B JPY (≈$533M) | 59 | 55 | |
| 643 | 17.1B TWD (≈$530M) | 59 | 74 | |
| 643 | 51.5B USD | 59 | 50 | |
| 643 | 19.7B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 643 | 6.8B USD | 59 | 49 | |
| 643 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 59 | 58 | |
| 643 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 33 | |
| 643 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 59 | 56 | |
| 643 | 13.9B THB (≈$389M) | 59 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score