Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Murphy USA Inc.
How Murphy USA Inc. stacks up
MUSA · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #108 of 356 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MUSA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.6% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MUSA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MUSA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 6.4% | 4.3% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 10.3% | 8.4% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 5.8% | 5.3% | 54% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 8.4% | 35.8% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MUSA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 100 | 4.4B USD | 62 | 45 | |
| 106 | 390M USD | 61 | 59 | |
| 106 | 8.0B USD | 61 | 52 | |
| 108 | 9.5B USD | 60 | 66 | |
| 108 | 9.4B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 108 | 5.1B USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 108 | 5.2B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 112 | 3.6B USD | 59 | 59 | |
| 112 | 4.2B USD | 59 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score