Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Meritage Homes Corporation
How Meritage Homes Corporation stacks up
MTH · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #121 of 356 · scores higher than 64% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MTH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 7.2% | 4.3% | 79% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 7.8% | 8.4% | 46% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 9.5% | 5.3% | 76% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 115.7% | 35.8% | 88% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 117 | 2.2B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 117 | 7.4B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 121 | 327M USD | 57 | 51 | |
| 121 | 604M USD | 57 | 33 | |
| 121 | 4.4B USD | 57 | 53 | |
| 121 | 2.6B USD | 57 | 49 | |
| 121 | 4.2B USD | 57 | 31 | |
| 121 | 2.0B USD | 57 | 27 | |
| 121 | 1.8B USD | 57 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score