Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marathon Petroleum Corporation
How Marathon Petroleum Corporation stacks up
MPC · against 28 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
59/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #7 of 29 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.9% vs peer median 12.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.1% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.7% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 29 reported | 6.8% | 6.2% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 29 reported | 10.1% | 9.4% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 25 reported | 10.7% | 5.8% | 96% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 27 reported | 15.8% | 37.4% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 2 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 4 | 135.8B USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 5 | 81.4B USD | 69 | 78 | |
| 6 | 204.7B USD | 65 | 44 | |
| 7 | 120.0B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 8 | 69.4B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 9 | 89.1B USD | 55 | 59 | |
| 10 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 54 | 58 | |
| 10 | 173.5B USD | 54 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score