Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Miller Industries, Inc.
How Miller Industries, Inc. stacks up
MLR · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #971 of 1,604 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score161 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including MLR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 67% of peers. Operating margin: 4.0% vs peer median 6.4%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 2.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.4% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 7.4% | 7.3% | 50% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 4.0% | 6.4% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 2.4% | 3.3% | 39% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 3.4% | 7.7% | 33% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 14.7% | 30.2% | 18% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 971 | 3.5B USD | 39 | 34 | |
| 971 | 15.2B USD | 39 | 57 | |
| 971 | 13.9B THB (≈$389M) | 39 | 42 | |
| 971 | 1.5B USD | 39 | 50 | |
| 971 | 593M USD | 39 | 40 | |
| 971 | 325M EUR (≈$358M) | 39 | 43 | |
| 987 | 24.2B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 38 | 29 | |
| 987 | 4.8B CNY (≈$676M) | 38 | 43 | |
| 987 | 1.60T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score