Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Miller Industries, Inc.
How Miller Industries, Inc. stacks up
MLR · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
3/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,531 of 1,586 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score151 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including MLR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 3?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth, earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: -20.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 94% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -66.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 91% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -8.7% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | -20.9% | 3.7% | 4% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -66.0% | 4.1% | 6% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | -8.7% | 4.3% | 9% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1,531 | 498M GBP (≈$647M) | 3 | 3 | |
| 1,531 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score