Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MICC · against 149 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #93 of 150 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including MICC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | MICC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 146 reported | 1.8% | 3.7% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 151 reported | 8.5% | 9.0% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | Not reported | 5.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | Not reported | 39.9% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 933M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 2 | 212M USD | 93 | 72 | |
| 2 | 843M USD | 93 | 88 | |
| 4 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 67 | |
| 90 | 2.9B USD | 36 | 20 | |
| 90 | 409M USD | 36 | 37 | |
| 90 | 3.3B USD | 36 | 71 | |
| 93 | 18.2B USD | 35 | 43 | |
| 93 | 11.7B USD | 35 | 35 | |
| 93 | 408M USD | 35 | 27 | |
| 96 | 11.7B USD | 34 | 38 | |
| 97 | 376.4B USD | 33 | 51 | |
| 97 | 21.9B USD | 33 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score