Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Suja Life, Inc.
How Suja Life, Inc. stacks up
SUJA · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #516 of 799 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including SUJA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -7.2% vs peer median 4.5%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.7% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SUJA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SUJA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -7.2% | 4.5% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 9.7% | 8.9% | 55% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 46.8% | 54.4% | 44% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SUJA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 516 | 270.6B INR (≈$3.2B) | 35 | 72 | |
| 516 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score