Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FRPT · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #508 of 799 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FRPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | FRPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 5.4% | 4.5% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 5.6% | 8.9% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 1.8% | 6.3% | 21% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 36.6% | 54.4% | 33% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 508 | 6.6B HKD (≈$843M) | 36 | 78 | |
| 508 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.9B USD |
| 36 |
| 20 |
| 508 | 409M USD | 36 | 37 |
| 508 | 163.7B INR (≈$2.0B) | 36 | 63 |
| 508 | 3.3B USD | 36 | 71 |
| 516 | 18.6B MYR (≈$4.1B) | 35 | 76 |
| 516 | 84.8B JPY (≈$576M) | 35 | 53 |
| 516 | 18.2B USD | 35 | 43 |
| 516 | 270.6B INR (≈$3.2B) | 35 | 72 |