Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to McGraw Hill, Inc.
How McGraw Hill, Inc. stacks up
MH · against 820 other Consumer Defensive companies
Profitability
52/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #391 of 821 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score82 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including MH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 65% of peers. Return on assets: 2.5% vs peer median 4.0%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.3% vs peer median 7.7%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 76% of peers. Operating margin: 13.9% vs peer median 7.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 761 reported | 7.3% | 7.7% | 48% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 817 reported | 13.9% | 7.6% | 76% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 784 reported | 2.5% | 4.0% | 35% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 770 reported | 17.3% | 8.3% | 80% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 824 reported | 81.7% | 32.0% | 99% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 229.1B INR (≈$2.7B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 3 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 4.0B MYR (≈$881M) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 391 | 2.3B CNY (≈$326M) | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score